بررسی عمکرد کارایی پرتفویی بر اساس رویکرد تلفیقی(اقتصادی-حسابداری) بر اساس روش تحلیل ‏پوششی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت مالی دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

2 استادیار و عضو هیات علمی دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصادی واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

ارزیابی عملکرد انتخاب پرتفویی مطلوب و بهینه به عنوان مساله ای مهم برای سرمایه‌گذاران حقیقی و حقوقی شامل ایجاد سبد سهامی برای حداکثرسازی مطلوبیت سرمایه‌گذار می شود. تعیین رویکردی مناسب برای ارزیابی عملکرد کارایی پرتفویی سهام یکی از مهم ترین مباحث امروزین در دانش مدیریت سرمایه‌گذاری است. روش ارزیابی چنین سبد سهامی همواره ذهن محققان و تحلیل‌گران مالی را به خود معطوف ساخته است. بطوری در انتخاب معیارهای ارزیابی نمی توان یک پروژه‌ی سرمایه‌گذاری را تنها بر اساس بازدهی بالا آن انتخاب کرد. مدل‌هایی برای ارزیابی عملکرد پرتفوی با توجه توأمان به ریسک و بازده ارائه شده مبتنی بر رویکرد بنیادین عناصر مالی نیستند. لذا در این تحقیق بررسی عمکرد کارایی پرتفویی بر اساس رویکرد تلفیقی(اقتصادی-حسابداری) بر اساس روش تحلیل ‏پوششی که جز مدل سازی چند هدفه پرداخته شده است استفاده شده است. از نتایج به دست آمده استنتاج می‌شود، رویکرد حسابداری نسبت به رویکرد اقتصادی و رویکرد ترکیبی کاراتر می‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Portfolio Performance Assessment Based on a Mixed (Economic-Accounting) Approach and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fatemeh Dadbeh 1
  • Maryam khalili araghi 2
1 Ph.D. student of financial management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant professor and faculty member of Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The performance evaluation of optimal portfolio selection as an important matter for all investors involves creating portfolios that maximize investor utility. Determining an appropriate approach to performance evaluation of portfolio efficiency is one of the most important current issues in the field of investment management. Several portfolio assessment techniques have always been concerned by researchers and financial analysts. Therefore, in selecting the evaluation criteria, one cannot select an investment project solely on the basis of its high returns. Portfolio performance evaluation models presented by focusing upon both risk and return are not based on the fundamental approach to financial elements. Therefore, this study addresses the portfolio performance assessment based on a mixed (economic-accounting) approach and using data envelopment analysis (DEA) as the multipurpose modeling. The results show that the accounting approach is more efficient than the economic approach and the combined approach.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Portfolio Efficiency
  • Mixed (Economic-Accounting) Approach
  • Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)

مراجع

  • اصغری زاده، عزت الله؛ حاج زوار، فرناز، تحلیل پس بهینگی رتبه بندی عوامل مؤثر بر تصمیم‌گیری سرمایه‌گذاری در شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، زمستان 1395، صفحه 1-18
  • حیدرزاده، مهدی(1394) شناسایی و رتبه بندی عوامل موثر بر انتخاب سهام با استفاده از روشAHP ، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه آزاد سنندج، زمستان 1395.
  • Worthington and T. West, Australian Evidence Concerning the Information Content of Economic Value Added, Australian Journal of Management, Vol. 29, No. 2, (December2004), p. 241.
  • AbdelKader Ouatik El-Alaoui, Obiyathulla Ismath Bacha, Mansur Masih, Mehmet Asutay, Does low leverage minimise the impact of financial shocks? New optimisation strategies using Islamic stock screening for European portfolios, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Volume 57, November 2018, P. 160-184
  • AICPA,Accounting and Valuation Guide: Valuation of Privately-Held-Company Equity Securities Issued as CompensationOct 31, 2016
  • Bin Guo, Wei Zhang, Yongjie Zhang, Han Zhang, The five-factor asset pricing model tests for the Chinese stock market. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Volume 43, June 2017, P. 84-106
  • Luca,Company and Investment Valuation: How to determine the value of any company or asset,Jan 21, 2017
  • Hiss and P. Phan, CEO Tenure as the Terminant of CEO Pay, Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 34, Issue 3, (1991), p. 708.
  • Carmichael, B., & Koumou, G. B., & Moran, K. (2015). Unifying Portfolio Diversification Measures Using Rao's Quadratic Entropy.CIRANO (Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis of Organizations) Working Papers
  • Cheng Chen, Yudong Wang, Understanding the multifractality in portfolio excess returns, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Volume 466, 15 January 2017, P. 346-355
  • Bausch, W. Barbara and M. Blome, Is Market Value-Based Residual Income aSuperior Performance Measure Compared to Book Value
  • Hendriksen and M. F.Van Breda, Accounting Theory. 5th ed, (New York: IRWIIN,1992), p. 408.
  • B. Stewart, The Quest for Value: A Guide for Senior Managers, (New York: HarperBusiness Publisher, 1991), p. 66.
  • Giuliano Curatola, Optimal portfolio choice with loss aversion over consumption, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Volume 66, November 2017, P. 345-358
  • Gour Sundar Mitra Thakur, Rupak Bhattacharyya, Seema Sarkar (Mondal), Stock portfolio selection using Dempster–Shafer evidence theory, Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, Volume 30, Issue 2, April 2018, P. 223-235
  • Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng and Jih-Jeng Huang, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, cbc press Finance, Jun 22, 2011
  • M. Bacidore, J. A. Boquist, T. T. Milbourn and A. V. Thakor, The Search for The Best Financial Performance Measure, Financial Analysts Journal, (May/June 1997), p. 14. E. Bausch, W. Barbara and M. Blome, Is Market Value-Based Residual Income a Superior Performance Measure Compared to Book Value-Based Residual Income?,Working Paper 2003, No. 1. Justus-liebig-Universitat. (2003), p. 1.
  • M. Bacidore, J. A. Boquist, T. T. Milbourn and A. V. Thakor, The Search for The Best Financial Performance Measure, Financial Analysts Journal, (May/June 1997), p. 14.
  • Joe Zhu, Data Envelopment Analysis: Let the Data Speak for Themselves, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform (May 6, 2014)
  • Lehn and A. K. Makhija, EVA, Accounting Profits and CEO Turnover: An Empirical Examination, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol. 10, No. 2, (1996), p. 97.
  • M. Lovata and M. L. Costigan, Empirical Analysis of Adapter Value Added,Management Accounting Research, Vol. 13, (2002), p. 216.
  • McKinsey & Company Inc. and Tim Koller(2015), Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies, (Wiley Finance), Aug 17, 2015
  • Olufemi Adewale Aluko, Oladapo Fapetu, Bolanle Aminat Azeez, International portfolio diversification in the Nigerian stock market: A global financial crisis perspective, Future Business Journal, Volume 4, Issue 2, December 2018, P. 189-194
  • Pandari, A.R., & Azar, A., & Shavazi, A.R. (2012). Genetic algorithms for portfolio selection problem with non-linear objectives. African Journal of Business Management, 6, 6209-6216.
  • Qiang Song, Anqi Liu, Steve Y. Yang ,Stock portfolio selection using learning-to-rank algorithms with news sentiment, Neurocomputing, Volume 264, 15 November 2017, P. 20-28
  • Ricky Lam,Taking stock of portfolio assessment scholarship: From research to practice, Assessing Writing, Volume 31, January 2017, P. 84-97
  • Ross Jennings, Mark, J. Le Clere and Robert B. Thompson, Evidence on The Usefulness of Alternative Earnings Per Share Measures, Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 53, No. 6,(1997), p. 42.
  • Abraham Ravid, Naciye Sekerci, Large investors’ portfolio composition and firms value, Journal of Corporate Finance, In press, corrected proof, Available online 31 August 2018.
  • Chen and J. L. Dodd, Operating Income, Residual Income and EVA(TM): Which Metric Is More Value Relevant?, Journal of Managerial Issues, Vol. 13, Issue 1, (Spring2001), p. 69.
  • Chen and J. L. Dodd, Operating Income, Residual Income and EVA (TM): Which Metric Is More Value Relevant?, Journal of Managerial Issues, Vol. 13, Issue 1, (Spring 2001), p. 69.
  • Stephan M. Gasser, Margarethe Rammerstorfer, Karl Weinmayer, Markowitz revisited: Social portfolio engineering, European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 258, Issue 3, 1 May 2017, P. 1181-1190
  • Thompson, Richard C., Yi Su, Gunnar Lucko, Measuring Project Performance Inspired by Stock Index, Procedia Engineering, Volume 196, 2017, P. 706-713
  • Tirimisiyu F. Oloko, Portfolio diversification between developed and developing stock markets: The case of US and UK investors in Nigeria, Research in International Business and Finance, Volume 45, October 2018, P. 219-232.
  • Tuck Siong Chung, Angie Low, The impact of investor impatience and environmental turbulence on myopic marketing management and stock performance, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Volume 34, Issue 3, September 2017, P. 660-677
  • W. Suojanen, Accounting Theory and the Large Corporation, The AccountingReview, (July 1954), p. 392.

فایل ها

اشتراک گذاری

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار